<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Commercial Litigation Update - Business Disputes, Government
Investigations, Enforcement, and More | Epstein Becker Green</title>
					<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/author/daniella-r-lee</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/author/daniella-r-lee?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Commercial Litigation Update - Business Disputes, Government Investigations, Enforcement, and More.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:53:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>First DOJ DEI False Claims Act Investigation Settlement Fetches $17 Million</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/first-doj-dei-false-claims-act-investigation-settlement-fetches-17-million</link>
<dc:creator>Erica Sibley Bahnsen, George B. Breen, Daniella R. Lee, Haley  Morrison</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>first-doj-dei-false-claims-act-investigation-settlement-fetches-17-million</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 10, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ibm-pays-17-million-resolve-allegations-discrimination-through-illegal-dei-practices">announced</a> the first <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1435761/dl">settlement</a> to resolve False Claims Act (FCA) allegations regarding a private employer&rsquo;s failure to comply with anti-discrimination requirements in contracts with the federal government. The settlement with IBM comes just two weeks after the March 26 signing of a new executive order called &ldquo;Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors&rdquo; (EO 14398), curbing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programming (read more <a href="https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/publications/another-dei-executive-order-what-it-means-for-employers">here</a>).&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOJ Creates National Fraud Enforcement Division: What It Means for Fraud
Enforcement in America</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/doj-creates-national-fraud-enforcement-division-what-it-means-for-fraud-enforcement-in-america</link>
<dc:creator>Erica Sibley Bahnsen, Julianna  Dzwierzynski, Sarah M. Hall, Daniella R.
Lee, Elena M. Quattrone, Zachary S. Taylor</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>doj-creates-national-fraud-enforcement-division-what-it-means-for-fraud-enforcement-in-america</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 09:00:02 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Several areas of federal criminal prosecution, including health care fraud, have been pulled under the umbrella of the new National Fraud Enforcement Division (&ldquo;NFED&rdquo;) of the Department of Justice (&ldquo;DOJ&rdquo;), with the stated goal of &ldquo;rapidly and substantially&rdquo; increasing resources and creating a robust litigating division.</li>
<li>DOJ is centralizing enforcement priorities by deputizing local U.S. Attorney&rsquo;s Offices, and encouraging state and local governmental fraud-fighting authorities to align with the NFED.</li>
<li>Priority areas of the NFED are yet to be announced, although we expect them to align with the priorities targeted by the Trump Administration in its other enforcement capacities, including &ldquo;illegal&rdquo; DEI, weaponization, and others.</li>
</ul>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Eleventh Circuit Allows Qui Tam Relators to Avoid Complaint Dismissal by
Using Information Obtained in Discovery</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/eleventh-circuit-allows-qui-tam-relators-to-avoid-complaint-dismissal-by-using-information-obtained-in-discovery</link>
<dc:creator>Daniella R. Lee, George B. Breen, Erica Sibley Bahnsen, Clay  Lee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>eleventh-circuit-allows-qui-tam-relators-to-avoid-complaint-dismissal-by-using-information-obtained-in-discovery</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 09:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held in <a href="https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202213340.pdf"><em>United States ex rel. Sedona Partners LLC v. Able Moving and Storage Inc.,</em></a> No. 22-13340 (11th Cir. Jul. 25, 2025), that while a district court has the discretion to dismiss a relator&rsquo;s complaint before or once discovery has begun, it may not disregard the allegations of <em>qui tam</em> relators at the motion to dismiss stage solely because those allegations reflect information obtained in discovery.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>EDPA Strengthens Its Approach to White-Collar Enforcement</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/edpa-strengthens-its-approach-to-white-collar-enforcement</link>
<dc:creator>Daniella R. Lee, Elena M. Quattrone, Jack E. Fernandez</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>edpa-strengthens-its-approach-to-white-collar-enforcement</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 14:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>In September 2025, the U.S. Attorneys&rsquo; Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (EDPA) announced that it would be implementing a <a href="https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/white-collar-justice-program#:~:text=The%20program%20promotes%20a%20culture,corruption%2C%20and%20abuse%20of%20power.">White-Collar Justice Program</a> to strengthen its white- collar enforcement framework. Among other things, the program will &ldquo;empower Assistant United States Attorneys to aggressively pursue complex investigations and significant new matters on their own initiative.&rdquo;</p>
<p>This announcement demonstrates another step in federal districts ramping up their white-collar enforcement efforts while encouraging robust procedures for compliance and self-disclosure. This is a trend several years in the making: in September 2022, <a href="https://www.justice.gov/d9/pages/attachments/2022/09/15/2022.09.15_ccag_memo.pdf">then-Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco directed U.S. attorneys</a> and others within the DOJ to review their policies on corporate voluntary self-disclosure, and to draft and share a formal written policy to incentivize such self-disclosure, if one was lacking.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOJ Updates Its Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs to Address New
Technologies, Reinforce Promoting a “Speak Up” Culture, and Ensure Data
Transparency</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/doj-updates-its-evaluation-of-corporate-compliance-programs-to-address-new-technologies-reinforce-promoting-a-speak-up-culture-and-ensure-data-transparency</link>
<dc:creator>Melissa L. Jampol, Daniella R. Lee, Shannon K. DeBra</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>doj-updates-its-evaluation-of-corporate-compliance-programs-to-address-new-technologies-reinforce-promoting-a-speak-up-culture-and-ensure-data-transparency</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:50:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On September 23, 2024, <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/principal-deputy-assistant-attorney-general-nicole-m-argentieri-delivers-remarks-society">Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri announced</a> updates to the U.S. Department of Justice&rsquo;s (&ldquo;DOJ&rdquo;) guidance relative to its Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations through the <a href="https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-fraud/page/file/937501/dl">Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (&ldquo;ECCP&rdquo;)</a>. The ECCP is &ldquo;meant to assist prosecutors in making informed decisions as to whether, and to what extent, the corporation&rsquo;s compliance program was effective at the time of [an offense under investigation], and is effective at the time of a charging decision or resolution, for purposes of determining the appropriate (1) form of any resolution or prosecution; (2) monetary penalty, if any; and (3) compliance obligations contained in any corporate criminal resolution (<em>e.g.</em>, monitorship or reporting obligations)&rdquo; with DOJ.</p>
<p>The ECCP <a href="https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/employee-personal-cell-phones-clawback-of-executive-compensation-and-more-on-voluntary-disclosures-doj-continues-to-update-important-policies-and-compliance-guidance">was updated last year</a> with new policies relating to a corporation&rsquo;s access to and retention of employee electronic communications as well as a company&rsquo;s compensation structure for executives and employees. This year&rsquo;s updates focus on three new policies regarding evaluations of:</p>
<ol>
<li>How companies are assessing and managing risk related to the use of new technology such as artificial intelligence (&ldquo;AI&rdquo;);</li>
<li>Companies&rsquo; &ldquo;speak up&rdquo; cultures; and</li>
<li>Compliance programs&rsquo; appropriate access to data, including to assess their own effectiveness.</li>
</ol>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOJ Launches the Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/doj-launches-the-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program</link>
<dc:creator>Daniella R. Lee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>doj-launches-the-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:45:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On August 1, 2024, the Department of Justice (&ldquo;DOJ&rdquo;) launched the <a href="https://www.justice.gov/criminal/media/1362321/dl?inline">Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program</a> (&ldquo;Pilot Program&rdquo;), a three-year initiative managed by the Criminal Division&rsquo;s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section.</p>
<p>This is the culmination of the DOJ&rsquo;s &ldquo;policy sprint,&rdquo; <a href="https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/main-justice-launches-a-90-day-policy-sprint-to-launch-a-whistleblower-rewards-program">announced back on March 7, 2024 by Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco</a>, intended to incentivize companies to invest in a culture of compliance. While <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-attorney-general-lisa-monaco-delivers-remarks-new-corporate-whistleblower-awards">announcing the Pilot Program on August 1st</a>, Monaco stated that this Pilot Program is intended to work with DOJ&rsquo;s corporate voluntary self-disclosure programs to &ldquo;create a multiplier effect that encourages <em>both</em> companies and individuals to tell [DOJ] what they know &ndash; and to tell [DOJ] as soon as they know it.&rdquo;</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>The Department of Justice’s Criminal Division Launches a Pilot Program on
Voluntary Self-Disclosures for Individuals</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/the-department-of-justices-criminal-division-launches-a-pilot-program-on-voluntary-self-disclosures-for-individuals</link>
<dc:creator>Daniella R. Lee, Melissa L. Jampol, Sarah M. Hall, Shannon K. DeBra, Raja 
Sékaran</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>the-department-of-justices-criminal-division-launches-a-pilot-program-on-voluntary-self-disclosures-for-individuals</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Since <a href="https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/will-there-be-a-new-wave-of-federal-white-collar-crime-enforcement-doj-announces-its-new-priorities-to-focus-on-combatting-corporate-wrongdoing">October 2021</a>, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been implementing a variety of changes to its corporate criminal enforcement policies. These efforts all reflect DOJ&rsquo;s focus on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/dojs-corporate-criminal-enforcement-policies-are-revised-individual-accountability-corporate-responsibility-additional-demands-on-chief-compliance-officers">individual accountability, punishing recidivist misconduct, prioritizing compliance and responsible corporate citizenship</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/what-healthcare-entities-need-to-know-about-the-new-doj-m-a-voluntary-self-disclosure-safe-harbor-policy">promoting corporate self-disclosure</a>, and <a href="https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/main-justice-launches-a-90-day-policy-sprint-to-launch-a-whistleblower-rewards-program">incentivizing whistleblowers to come forward</a>. The latest development in these efforts is the <a href="https://www.justice.gov/criminal/media/1347991/dl?inline">Criminal Division&rsquo;s Pilot Program on Voluntary Self-Disclosures for Individuals</a> that DOJ released on April 15, 2024.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>The U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Proposed 2024 Amendments to the Federal
Sentencing Guidelines Seek to Restore Consistency in Loss Calculations and
Mitigate the Impact of Acquitted Conduct</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/the-u-s-sentencing-commissions-proposed-2024-amendments-to-the-federal-sentencing-guidelines-seek-to-restore-consistency-in-loss-calculations-and-mitigate-the-impact-of-acquitted-conduct</link>
<dc:creator>Sarah M. Hall, Daniella R. Lee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>the-u-s-sentencing-commissions-proposed-2024-amendments-to-the-federal-sentencing-guidelines-seek-to-restore-consistency-in-loss-calculations-and-mitigate-the-impact-of-acquitted-conduct</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 09:00:08 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On December 26, 2023, the U.S. Sentencing Commission (&ldquo;USSC&rdquo;) <a href="https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/amendment-process/reader-friendly-amendments/20231221_rf-proposed.pdf">proposed several amendments to its Guidelines Manual</a><span> (the &ldquo;Guidelines&rdquo;)</span>. Two of these proposed amendments have the potential to especially impact sentencing decisions in white collar criminal cases. In particular, &nbsp;one amendment changes the rule for calculating loss, and another provides new options regarding the consideration of acquitted conduct.</p> <h2>Rule for Calculating Loss</h2> <p>The USSC&rsquo;s proposed revision to the Guidelines&rsquo; rules for calculating loss arises out of an effort to continually evaluate and&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Main Justice Launches a 90-Day “Policy Sprint” to Launch a Whistleblower
Rewards Program</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/main-justice-launches-a-90-day-policy-sprint-to-launch-a-whistleblower-rewards-program</link>
<dc:creator>Daniella R. Lee, Sarah M. Hall</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>main-justice-launches-a-90-day-policy-sprint-to-launch-a-whistleblower-rewards-program</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:00:09 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 7, 2024, <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-attorney-general-lisa-monaco-delivers-keynote-remarks-american-bar-associations">Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced the launch of a 90-day sprint to develop and implement a pilot program for DOJ&rsquo;s latest &ldquo;carrot&rdquo; to incentivize companies to invest in a culture of compliance: a whistleblower rewards program</a>. In an address at the American Bar Association&rsquo;s 39th National Institute on White Collar Crime, Monaco explained: &ldquo;[t]he premise is simple: if an individual helps DOJ discover significant corporate or financial misconduct &mdash; otherwise unknown to us &mdash; then the individual could qualify to receive a portion of the&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOJ’s Corporate Criminal Enforcement Policies Are Revised: Individual
Accountability, Corporate Responsibility, Additional Demands on Chief
Compliance Officers</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/dojs-corporate-criminal-enforcement-policies-are-revised-individual-accountability-corporate-responsibility-additional-demands-on-chief-compliance-officers</link>
<dc:creator>George B. Breen, Melissa L. Jampol, Daniella R. Lee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>dojs-corporate-criminal-enforcement-policies-are-revised-individual-accountability-corporate-responsibility-additional-demands-on-chief-compliance-officers</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 09:00:10 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Building on attempts in recent years to strengthen the Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) white collar criminal enforcement, on September 15, 2022, <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-attorney-general-lisa-o-monaco-delivers-remarks-corporate-criminal-enforcement">Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced</a> revisions to DOJ’s corporate criminal enforcement policies. <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/file/1535301/download">The new policies</a>, and those that are in development, further attempt to put pressure on companies to implement effective compliance policies and to self-report if there are problems. Notably, the new DOJ policies set forth changes to existing DOJ policies through a “combination of carrots and sticks – with a mix of incentives and deterrence,” with the goal of “giving general counsels and chief compliance officers the tools they need to make a business case for responsible corporate behavior” through seven key areas:</p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>