<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Commercial Litigation Update - Business Disputes, Government
Investigations, Enforcement, and More | Epstein Becker Green</title>
					<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/author/george-b-breen</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/author/george-b-breen?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Commercial Litigation Update - Business Disputes, Government Investigations, Enforcement, and More.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:37:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>DOJ Civil Division Announces Accelerated Review of FCA Whistleblower
Complaints Involving Federally Funded, State-Administered Benefits Programs</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/doj-civil-division-announces-accelerated-review-of-fca-whistleblower-complaints-involving-federally-funded-state-administered-benefits-programs</link>
<dc:creator>George B. Breen, Elizabeth A. Harris, Erica Sibley Bahnsen</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>doj-civil-division-announces-accelerated-review-of-fca-whistleblower-complaints-involving-federally-funded-state-administered-benefits-programs</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:15:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<h2>The Highlights</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Accelerated FCA Investigative Timeline:</strong> The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is taking new steps to implement the directives of Executive Order 14395 of March 16, 2026, &ldquo;Establishing the Task Force To Eliminate Fraud,&rdquo; <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/civil-division-moves-fast-track-benefits-fraud-enforcement">by expediting the review for newly filed False Claims Act (FCA) <em>qui tam</em> actions involving federally funded state-administered benefits programs.</a> The May 27, 2026, <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1442566/dl">memorandum</a> from Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate (&ldquo;Shumate Memo&rdquo;) states that all newly filed state-administered benefits program fraud <em>qui tam</em> actions will now be reviewed by DOJ in 60 to 120 days after filing to determine if the government will continue its investigation, permit the whistleblower to proceed, or act to dismiss the case.</li>
<li><strong>DOJ Reaffirmation of Relator Authority:</strong> The Shumate Memo reaffirms DOJ&rsquo;s position that whistleblowers may &ldquo;stand in the shoes&rdquo; of the government and indicates that the agency will let relators lead litigation subject to DOJ&rsquo;s &ldquo;oversight and ultimate control.&rdquo;</li>
<li><strong>Automatic Criminal and Administrative Referrals:</strong> New benefits program fraud <em>qui tam</em> matters will be automatically referred to the Criminal Division and/or the <a href="https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/doj-creates-national-fraud-enforcement-division-what-it-means-for-fraud-enforcement-in-america">National Fraud Enforcement Division</a> for evaluation of potential criminal violations and to the affected agency for potential administrative action, including payment suspension.</li>
</ul>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>First DOJ DEI False Claims Act Investigation Settlement Fetches $17 Million</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/first-doj-dei-false-claims-act-investigation-settlement-fetches-17-million</link>
<dc:creator>Erica Sibley Bahnsen, George B. Breen, Daniella R. Lee, Haley  Morrison</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>first-doj-dei-false-claims-act-investigation-settlement-fetches-17-million</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:00:02 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 10, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ibm-pays-17-million-resolve-allegations-discrimination-through-illegal-dei-practices">announced</a> the first <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1435761/dl">settlement</a> to resolve False Claims Act (FCA) allegations regarding a private employer&rsquo;s failure to comply with anti-discrimination requirements in contracts with the federal government. The settlement with IBM comes just two weeks after the March 26 signing of a new executive order called &ldquo;Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors&rdquo; (EO 14398), curbing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programming (read more <a href="https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/publications/another-dei-executive-order-what-it-means-for-employers">here</a>).&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Eleventh Circuit Allows Qui Tam Relators to Avoid Complaint Dismissal by
Using Information Obtained in Discovery</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/eleventh-circuit-allows-qui-tam-relators-to-avoid-complaint-dismissal-by-using-information-obtained-in-discovery</link>
<dc:creator>Daniella R. Lee, George B. Breen, Erica Sibley Bahnsen, Clay  Lee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>eleventh-circuit-allows-qui-tam-relators-to-avoid-complaint-dismissal-by-using-information-obtained-in-discovery</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 09:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held in <a href="https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202213340.pdf"><em>United States ex rel. Sedona Partners LLC v. Able Moving and Storage Inc.,</em></a> No. 22-13340 (11th Cir. Jul. 25, 2025), that while a district court has the discretion to dismiss a relator&rsquo;s complaint before or once discovery has begun, it may not disregard the allegations of <em>qui tam</em> relators at the motion to dismiss stage solely because those allegations reflect information obtained in discovery.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOJ’s Corporate Criminal Enforcement Policies Are Revised: Individual
Accountability, Corporate Responsibility, Additional Demands on Chief
Compliance Officers</title>
				<link>https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/dojs-corporate-criminal-enforcement-policies-are-revised-individual-accountability-corporate-responsibility-additional-demands-on-chief-compliance-officers</link>
<dc:creator>George B. Breen, Melissa L. Jampol, Daniella R. Lee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>dojs-corporate-criminal-enforcement-policies-are-revised-individual-accountability-corporate-responsibility-additional-demands-on-chief-compliance-officers</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 09:00:04 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Building on attempts in recent years to strengthen the Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) white collar criminal enforcement, on September 15, 2022, <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-attorney-general-lisa-o-monaco-delivers-remarks-corporate-criminal-enforcement">Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced</a> revisions to DOJ’s corporate criminal enforcement policies. <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/file/1535301/download">The new policies</a>, and those that are in development, further attempt to put pressure on companies to implement effective compliance policies and to self-report if there are problems. Notably, the new DOJ policies set forth changes to existing DOJ policies through a “combination of carrots and sticks – with a mix of incentives and deterrence,” with the goal of “giving general counsels and chief compliance officers the tools they need to make a business case for responsible corporate behavior” through seven key areas:</p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>