Late in the afternoon of January 19th, the Supreme Court dealt a crippling blow to the argument of the defeated former President, when by an 8-1 majority (Thomas, J., dissenting), the Court denied Mr. Trump's application for a stay of the mandate and injunction pending the review of the decision of the D.C. Circuit in the case of Trump v. Thompson, ordering the transmission by the Archivist of the documents sought by the House Select January 6th Committee.

In the interest of full disclosure, I note that I am an amicus, along with several others who occupied senior law and policy positions in previous Republican administrations, who filed a brief in support of the House Select Committee in this case.

In any event, in a terse unsigned opinion, the Court recognized that the question of the power of a former President to claim executive privilege notwithstanding the waiver of privilege by the incumbent President is a "serious and substantial" one. Nevertheless, the Court held that this issue need not be resolved because the Court of Appeals did not rely upon it, having held that the defeated former President's claims would have failed even if he were the incumbent, for reasons described in United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 713 (1974), and Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities v. Nixon, 498 F. 2d 725, 731 (CADC 1974) (en banc).

Thus, the Court held that the part of the Court of Appeals’ opinion stating that the incumbent could overrule his predecessor was to be treated as dictum. Justice Thomas dissented without opinion. Justice Kavanaugh opined separately that he felt a need to contradict what became the dictum of the D.C. Circuit as to its view that Trump's claim of executive privilege was trumped by his successor's waiver, but even Kavanaugh recognized that an ex-President's claim of privilege, like any other privilege, is not absolute.

One assumes that a package soon will be underway from the storage facility of the National Archives to the House of Representatives. As they say: "News at Eleven."

Back to Commercial Litigation Update Blog

Search This Blog

Blog Editors


Related Services



Jump to Page


Sign up to receive an email notification when new Commercial Litigation Update posts are published:

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.