There has been a good deal of recent attention given to the Supreme Court's so-called "shadow docket," a term that refers generally to the Court's (conservative majority's) issuing brief orders and unsigned opinions resolving procedural motions in a way that effectively disposes of cases, but without their having been fully briefed and argued.
The Court has decided the latest in a series of important cases interpreting the reach of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U. S. C. §§ 1 et seq.
On March 31, in Badgerow v. Walters, by an 8-1 majority (opinion written by Justice Kagan, and a lone dissent by Justice Breyer), the Court reversed an order of the Fifth Circuit and held that the federal courts do not have authority to “look through” an arbitration dispute for a federal question that would establish jurisdiction to confirm or deny an arbitral award.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Maryland Legislature Slashes Child Victims Act Damages Cap by More than 50%
- Master the First Moves in Litigation for Courtroom Advantage – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
- Medicaid Fraud Recoveries Top More Than $1 Billion in 2024—But Will the Big Beautiful Bill Impact Those Numbers in 2025?
- ACLU Sues Tennessee Over Immigration Law Making it a Felony to Vote for Sanctuary City Policies
- Term Ends with Major Decisions, Including Banning Universal Injunctions - SCOTUS Today