In a per curiam opinion issued in Calcutt v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Court has reversed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and remanded to it an enforcement action that had been brought against a bank executive charged with mismanaging a loan relationship. After agency proceedings were completed and sanctions ordered, the Sixth Circuit held that the FDIC had made two fundamental legal errors in adjudicating the case against the bank CEO who had appealed. However, instead of remanding the case to the FDIC, the Sixth Circuit conducted its own review and concluded that the FDIC had, on the evidence presented, made a supportable decision to ban and fine the executive.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- The Department of Justice’s COVID-19 Enforcement Task Force 2024 Report: A Continued Commitment to Combatting COVID-19-Related Fraud
- Dissecting the New FTC Final Rule That Regulates “Fake Reviews” and More
- DOJ Launches the Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program
- Making the Lawyer-Client Relationship Work in Challenging Litigation – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
- Authors Predict an Increase in the Use of State Court Receivership Proceedings