Background
On December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its decision in Stull v. Summa, a medical negligence case in which the defendants argued that Ohio’s statutory peer-review privilege protected from discovery the file a hospital maintained on a resident physician, which included, among other things, quality reviews and assessments of the resident’s clinical competency and professional conduct. The Supreme Court of Ohio decided one issue: Does the peer-review privilege in R.C. 2305.252 apply to a healthcare entity’s files concerning resident physicians?
This case arose from the medical treatment of head injuries that the patient sustained during a car crash. The patient and his guardians filed a medical negligence lawsuit against the hospital and its employed healthcare professionals, including a resident physician who participated in the patient’s care. The plaintiffs alleged that the resident improperly intubated the patient, causing the patient to sustain a brain injury
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- An Update on “Unsworn” Attorney Affirmations Under the New CPLR 2106: Recent Rulings Offer a Path to Cure
- First Circuit Clarifies FCA Liability for Clinical Labs: Key Takeaways for Compliance
- Supreme Court Sides Against Trump Administration on National Guard Deployment - SCOTUS Today
- Mass Arbitration Is on the Rise – JAMS or AAA? Know The Rules
- A Potential New Path for School Districts to Settle Child Victims Act Cases: New York’s Limited Finance Law Amended to Assist School Districts