A recent analysis of data released by the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) suggests that the vast majority of Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans extended to small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic have been forgiven. While positive, this news is cold comfort to PPP borrowers for whom forgiveness was denied, or, as we addressed previously, whose lenders required them to apply for forgiveness in amounts less than the full amount of their PPP loans. PPP borrowers can apply for forgiveness of their PPP loans any time up until the loan maturity date (2025 in many cases), and borrowers continue to receive denials of forgiveness for both first- and second-draw PPP loans. As a result, the PPP appeal process remains as important today as at its inception.

There are multiple reasons the SBA might deny forgiveness of a PPP loan, from the borrower not being eligible for the loan in the first instance to the borrower using the loan proceeds for unapproved purposes. However, forgiveness of some PPP loans has been denied based on what might otherwise be described as a miscommunication. For example, forgiveness of some loans has been denied because the SBA requested supporting documentation, and the documentation was never provided. When investigated, it turns out that the lender either (a) never communicated the documentation request from the SBA to the borrower or (b) never forwarded the documents provided by the borrower to the SBA. In these and similar instances where documents and information get “lost in translation” between the borrower, the lender, and the SBA, filing an appeal with the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals (“OHA”) may be the only way to rectify the situation. Once an appeal is filed, the SBA will be required to respond, and conduct an individualized review of the PPP loan at issue. Additionally, filing an appeal with the OHA is critical because it extends the loan deferment period until a final decision is issued. See 13 CFR § 134.1202(b).

Borrowers should also understand that filing an appeal does not necessarily mean that an OHA judge is going to issue a final decision affirming or reversing the SBA’s forgiveness determination. Once an appeal is filed, the SBA may look at the loan in more detail and decide to reconsider its position, in some cases granting the loan forgiveness the borrower was seeking from the beginning—clearly a positive result for the borrower. When this happens, the parties can agree to dismiss the appeal. This demonstrates that filing an appeal does not necessarily terminate the communication between the SBA and the borrower. In many cases, it may actually be the beginning of the communication—without the lender acting as intermediary—and can lead to an amicable resolution of the forgiveness dispute.

Alternatively, even if the SBA maintains its position on appeal that forgiveness should be denied, it is still within the OHA judge’s discretion to remand the PPP loan back to the SBA for further review, outside of the administrative appeals process. See 13 CFR § 134.1212. This could happen, for example, if the borrower presents issues and documentation on appeal that the OHA judge determines the SBA should consider further in its review of the borrower’s forgiveness application before coming to a final loan review decision.

The importance of the PPP appeal process cannot be overstated. It serves to protect the rights of borrowers and can provide an opportunity to interface with the SBA directly rather than through a lender. It therefore increases the chances of effectively communicating a borrower’s positions and concerns and can result in either a favorable decision from an OHA judge on the merits, a direction for the SBA to review the loan and forgiveness application, or an amicable resolution of the forgiveness dispute with the SBA. If you are a PPP borrower and have been notified that the SBA denied forgiveness of your loan, you should consider engaging an experienced attorney to guide you through the forgiveness process.

Back to Commercial Litigation Update Blog

Search This Blog

Blog Editors


Related Services



Jump to Page


Sign up to receive an email notification when new Commercial Litigation Update posts are published:

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.